There is nothing like dynastic rule in
democratic India. In ancient times the Rashtra or the State was
administrated by an eminent personality from a restricted class of Kshatriya (Royals)
clan. He was often referred to as “Gopa” (Protector of Cows) and “Samrat”
(Supreme Ruler). He governed the people with their consent and approval. Samrat’s
main duty was to protect the people and their cattle. The main intention of the
Samrat along with protecting his people was to uphold Dharma, the
righteousness. He had Sabha (House of People) and Samiti (Committee) which
assist him in governance. He was aided by two functionaries, the Raja Purohita,
a learned person who was masters in four arts of Mantras (all rituals),
Economics, Politics and Warfare and a Senani, the Army Chief.
The legacy would continue for the generations
and that was called Dynasty. The society at that time had four class of work
force. The first was the teaching/artist class, the second was the warrior/fighter
class, and then we had business/trading class and finally the working/service
class. Now, if we carefully observe this category was based on the nature of
the individual.
An individual who had
Sattva Guna alone in predominance was categorised as Brahamana (Teacher/Scholar/Artist).
An individual who had
Sattva and Rajas with Rajas in prominence was a Kshatriya (Warrior/Ruler/Administrator).
An individual who had
Rajas and Tamas with Tamas in prominence was a Vaisya (Businessmen/Merchant/Tradesmen).
An individual who had
Tamo Guna alone in predominance was categorised as Sudra (Worker/Craftsmen/Servicemen).
All the four category
of work force did not depend on the dynastic hierarchy, except for the Kshatriya
and Vaishya clan which required the hereditary factor. While for the Kshatriya clan
the requisite depended on the ancestral gene of strength and vigour, and for the
Vaishya the tactics and strategy of trading was in the gene. The twisting
strands of DNA would tell the tale of every individual in both these classes.
Moreover these two classes had inheritance which was a major factor, a Prince
would inherit the Kingdom from the King and the business tycoons’ son would
inherit the business empire. The other two classes
did not require the gene for their endeavour. The teacher/scholar/artist class
and the worker/craftsmen/servicemen never depended on the parents’ genealogy,
neither was the property of ancestry of any use to their ventures.
So, it became important of the Kshatriya to be
born in a Royal family and the Vaishya to be born in the family doing business.
The Brahmana and Shudra could be anyone; in fact we have a story of how King
Kowshika who was born in the royal family became Vishwamitra (Friend of the
Universe) by subduing his Rajo Guna and elevating his Sattva Guna. Our puranas
too mention many instances where the successful vaishyas yielding to gratify
their senses fuel the Tamo Guna.
Now in recent times we are not ruled by anyone
we have a people’s representative who looks after the administration. There is
no necessity that one has to be born in certain family to get elected to
represent us. In democracy anybody can elect anyone depending on his caliber to
deliver and dynasty exists only in business class in this present era. It is
idiocy to think our country runs on the Dynastic Rule. If we agree to that most
of the country runs on the dynasty, then the meaning of Democracy is lost......What
say???
No comments:
Post a Comment