Life of every individual is different. Although there is no similarity
our ancients never approved inferior and superior status. For the society to thrive, they knew very well every individuals contribution was must. The service
of a teacher, physician, sewer, potter, farmer, barber, weaver, butcher, solider,
sweeper and priest were needed for anyone to live a comfortable life in the
society. There was no question of predominant or subordinate in the society,
everyone irrespective of their contribution to the society was equal.
The way of thinking of the inhabitants was also so, they had understood
the verse of Bhagavad Gita Chapter 5 verse 18 where Sri Krishna tells Arjuna:
Vidya vinaya
sampanne brahmane, gavi, hastini,
suni caiva svapake ca panditah samadarsinah
suni caiva svapake ca panditah samadarsinah
Meaning: A wise man sees a learned and humble Brahmin, a cow, an
elephant, a dog, a dog eater and all other living beings as equal.
We cannot say when we lost this Samadarshana (looking all as same). As
we lost the mindset of looking all as same, we started to rectify it with Samatva
(Equality). Now the real issue started instead of getting back the triat of
treating everyone as the same we started to create a similar status to all. So
the acceptance of the first sentence in this write up “Life of every individual
is different” now changes to “Life of every individual has to be same.” In the rukus
to create equality in society, Dharma (Justice) was snubbed. The Aarakshana
(Reservation) stepped in creating even more discrimination and discontent.
There was nothing wrong in reservation as it was introduced to uplift
those who were not looked at as same. But the fallout of this reservation was
that Gaunya (Merit) was overlooked. Reservation
is for those who don’t have anything, who don’t have the most basic means of
sustenance; it’s not for those who drive around in cars or travel first class,
or even those who raise slogans to divide the very country which funds their
free education. No community or a person should be branded backward. Politicians have used this divide to their favour to come to power.
The Mahabharata war could have been ended in 3 minutes because
of Bheema’s grandson, Barbarika who was a brave warrior. He was blessed by Maharudradeva
and bestowed with three powerful arrows. The power of the three arrows was such
that, with one arrow he could mark all those whom he
would wanted to destroy, the second one would mark all whom he wished to save.
And with the third arrow he could destroy everyone marked by the first arrow.
When Sri Krishna came to know about the three arrows he asked Barbarika
which side he would support, Pandavas or Kauravas. Amazingly Ahilawathi, the
mother of Barbarika had advised him to side with the smaller army, so
considering that the Pandava’s had a smaller army he said he would side with
them. Sri Krishna knew that during the course of the battle whichever side
Barbarika was would become huge and hence he would have to jump to the other
side, this was a huge paradox. There was no Dharma in supporting the smaller or
weaker side, thus Sri Krishna asked him his head so that his involvement in the
war would be avoided. Before giving his head to Sri Krishna, Barbarika expressed
his desire to view the war, leading to Sri Krishna placing Barbarika’s head
on the top of a mountain overlooking the battlefield.
This story tells us that appeasing of any community or a section
of people without following Dharma is not good.
No comments:
Post a Comment